The Triple AuditFull Report
Audit B · method + the Merlino stack

Koray x Merlino

Keep the semantic base. Add the patent literature, the Diggity rules, live Google Business data, and the hidden-intent decode. Twelve structural findings become 43 causal ones, with the GMB mystery cracked.

Lane scores: semantic 29 · local 21 · patents 18
Audit B · three lanesthe upgrade

Take Koray. Add the Merlino stack.

Take Koray. Add the Merlino stack.

Audit B keeps the entire Koray base and bolts on four more lenses: Bill Slawski's SEO by the Sea patent analysis (how Google actually scores links, entities, and local prominence), Matt Diggity's battle-tested on-page rules, the Merlino local/GBP playbook with live DataForSEO data, and intent-behind-intent decoding that reads the customer's hidden motivation, not just the keyword. Three specialist lanes ran in parallel: semantic + intent, local + GBP, and patents.

  • Slawski patents: judge the site the way the algorithms are written.
  • Diggity three kings: title, H1, first paragraph must carry the money keyword.
  • Live GBP + SERP data via API, not guesses.
  • Intent-behind-intent: the walk-in shower buyer is really buying fall-proof independence.
Audit B · local lanethe mystery, cracked

Why the business is invisible on Google Maps

Why the business is invisible on Google Maps

Audit A could not even ask this question. Audit B pulled the live listing data and found the answer: there are TWO active Google Business Profiles for the same company, one with 15 reviews and one with 26, splitting authority and violating Google policy. Worse, the listing is pinned at a warehouse on Distributors Row while the website and schema say Magazine Street: different streets, different ZIP codes, different neighborhoods. Add a second phone number in old press releases and Google faces a four-way identity conflict it refuses to resolve in anyone's favor.

  • Two live GBPs, 41 reviews split 15/26. One merge consolidates them.
  • GMB address vs website address: two different neighborhoods.
  • Four NAP versions in the wild. Google cannot pick a winner, so nobody wins.
Root cause found: prominence collapse from entity conflict, not a penalty.
Audit B · patents lanereading links like Google does

The link profile, scored by the patent literature

The link profile, scored by the patent literature

The patents lane took the 735-link profile and ran it through the actual literature. Under the Reasonable Surfer Model (US 8,117,209 B1), links a real user would never click transfer almost nothing: and this profile is dominated by a single press-release syndication blast with the same anchor repeated 138 times across newswire clones. Under the temporal profile patent (US 7,346,839), that burst-then-silence pattern is itself a footprint. The verdict: hundreds of links, near-zero equity, and a signature that looks manufactured because it was.

  • One press-release campaign explains 543 of the links. Three target URLs. Zero to city pages.
  • Reasonable Surfer: syndication links carry near-zero weight.
  • 96% dofollow ratio: the ABSENCE of natural nofollow is itself a tell.
Audit B · the deltawhat B added over A

From WHAT is broken to WHY it is broken

From WHAT is broken to WHY it is broken

Audit B kept every Audit A finding and upgraded it. A flagged the homepage H1 as a marketing tagline; B applied the three-kings rule and wrote the replacement: New Orleans Bathroom Remodeling Completed in 1 Day. A flagged the walk-in shower page generically; B identified the hidden buyer (aging-in-place, mobility anxiety) and the exact H2 to win them. A suspected the sister domain; B confirmed both run the same form infrastructure and found both GBP listings. Twelve findings became 43, and every one now came with a cause and a prescription.

  • Every A finding kept, none contradicted: the base method holds.
  • 31 new findings, each with a named cause and an exact fix.
  • Still blind: link reality (WAF), AI rendering, CRO, competitor topology.
Lane scores: semantic 29/100, local 21/100, patents 18/100.